Home › O-PAS Certification Tracker

Certification · Profiles · Procurement Evidence

O-PAS certification tracker What is certified, and what still has to be tested

A dated record of products found in The Open Group O-PAS™ Certification Register, the profiles named in their public evidence, and the work an owner or EPC still has to close at the system and project levels.

View the Current Record ↓ Open the Official Register ↗

Last checked · 17 September 2026

An O-PAS certification claim is only useful when it names the supplier, exact product, version or configuration, applicable O-PAS edition, certified profiles and current register record.

The certification establishes conformance within that scope. It does not by itself prove that a group of selected products will interoperate in the project architecture, or that the delivered system satisfies the owner's functional, performance, security and recovery requirements.

1product record identified in the official register when checked
2O-PAS profiles named in that product's public certification evidence
3separate evidence layers: conformance, interoperability and acceptance

01 · Current record

Product identified in the official certification register

This tracker records what could be verified from The Open Group register and the supplier's public certification notice on the date shown above. The official register remains the source of truth for current status. For the broader commercial market, use the O-PAS Vendor and Product Landscape.

Listed when checked

ASRock Industrial iEP-5010G-010

A fanless industrial IoT controller certified under the O-PAS Standard, 2nd Edition programme. ASRock Industrial describes it as the first product certified under The Open Group O-PAS Certification Program.

Supplier
ASRock Industrial Computer Corporation
Product
iEP-5010G-010
Standard basis
O-PAS Standard, 2nd Edition
Public announcement
4 August 2026
Profile
OSM-003 · Redfish® System Management Profile
Profile
PP-003 · Regulatory Physical Platform Profile
Independent verification
Enterprise Transformation Partners and IECEE, as reported by the supplier
Tracker check
17 September 2026

What the record supports: a procurement team can cite this exact product and the two named profiles as certification evidence, subject to confirming the current register record and the offered product configuration at bid time.

What it does not settle: application execution, communications with every selected component, project-specific cybersecurity, performance under the required load, failover, recovery, maintainability or complete system acceptance.

Check The Open Group register ↗   Read the supplier certification notice ↗

Tracker method: a product is included here only when an identifiable record appears in The Open Group O-PAS Certification Register. Supplier statements about alignment, readiness, participation or testing are not treated as equivalent to a current product certification.

02 · Scope

O-PAS certification is profile-based

The O-PAS Standard covers multiple parts of an open process automation architecture. The certification programme organizes conformance around defined profiles. A product can therefore be certified for named capabilities without being certified for every function in the standard.

Product

Exact identity

Confirm the manufacturer, model, hardware option, software or firmware release and any conditions attached to the certified configuration.

Profile

Exact scope

Name the profile identifiers and descriptions. “O-PAS certified” without the applicable profile scope is incomplete procurement evidence.

Status

Current record

Verify the product in the official register when bids are evaluated and again before release for manufacture or purchase.

The specification rule

Do not write “all products shall be O-PAS compliant” and leave the bidder to infer the scope. Map each product class to the applicable profiles, acceptable evidence, required versions and any project tests that certification does not close.

03 · Assurance model

Keep three bodies of evidence separate

Each layer answers a different question. A sound project uses all three and states which party owns each one.

Product conformance

Does this product meet the named profile requirements?

Use the current official certification record, conformance statement and exact product identification. This is evidence about a bounded product scope.

System interoperability

Do the selected products work together in this architecture?

Test the actual versions, configurations, information exchanges, timing, identity, failure behavior and recovery paths at the project's component boundaries.

Project acceptance

Does the delivered system satisfy the contract and operating need?

Verify control functions, alarms, sequences, performance, cybersecurity, resilience, maintainability, documentation and handover through FAT, SAT and commissioning.

For the project test structure, use the O-PAS FAT and Interoperability Testing Guide.

04 · Bid review

Seven checks before accepting a certification claim

The evidence should be reviewable by an estimator, engineer and commercial lead without relying on a supplier's general product-family statement.

CheckEvidence to requestDecision
1. Register statusCurrent official O-PAS Certification Register entry.Is the record current on the review date?
2. Product identityManufacturer, model, orderable part number and configuration.Is the offered item the certified item?
3. Version identityHardware revision, firmware, operating system and software release where applicable.Are project versions inside the certified scope?
4. Profile coverageNamed profile identifiers and conformance statement.Do the profiles close the requirements allocated to the product?
5. ExceptionsLimitations, optional features, dependencies and deviations.What remains for the project to engineer or test?
6. Boundary testsInteroperability scenarios for the selected supplier combination.Who proves the products work together?
7. Change controlRules for substitutions, upgrades, patches and recertification checks.What happens if the supplied baseline changes?

Put the evidence in the bid basis

For each required profile, name the responsible supplier, the document that closes conformance, the project test that closes interoperability, and the party that pays for correction and retest if the boundary fails.

Assign responsibilities with the O-PAS matrix →

05 · Claim discipline

Related evidence can be valuable without being the same claim

Several statements sound similar in a proposal. They should not be scored as interchangeable.

StatementWhat it may demonstrateWhat to verify
Listed in the O-PAS Certification RegisterFormal product certification for the scope identified by the current record.Product, version, profiles, status and conformance statement.
Certified against a referenced technology profileConformance to a technology used by an O-PAS profile, such as an OPC UA test programme.Issuing body, tested release, exact profile and whether an O-PAS register record exists.
O-PAS aligned, ready or compatibleSupplier design intent or implementation positioning.Objective requirements, independent evidence and project test scope.
Used in an OPA or COPA deploymentProject experience in a particular integrated system.Configuration, interfaces, project acceptance evidence and relevance to the new project.

Example: Yokogawa reported OPC Foundation certification for release 1.02.10 of its Open Automation SI Kit against the OPC UA client/server communication profile used by O-PAS. That is relevant profile evidence. It should still be described by its exact issuing body and scope rather than automatically represented as the same thing as a current product entry in The Open Group register.

06 · Source record

Primary sources used for this tracker

Certification status changes. Follow the official register for the current record and use supplier notices only to add product detail.

CSI is not the certification authority. The Open Group register and the certification documents linked from it govern current certification status.

07 · FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How many O-PAS certified products are listed?

When this tracker was checked on 17 September 2026, one identifiable product record was found in The Open Group O-PAS Certification Register: the ASRock Industrial iEP-5010G-010. Always check the official register for the current count and status.

Does certification apply to the whole O-PAS Standard?

Not automatically. The programme is profile-based. Procurement evidence should identify the exact certified profiles, product and applicable version or configuration.

Does an O-PAS certified product guarantee interoperability?

No. Certification provides conformance evidence for a defined product scope. The project must still test the selected products together in the intended architecture, versions, configuration, loading and failure conditions.

Can a project require products that are not yet certified?

Yes, but the specification should state the acceptable alternative evidence, the verification work the project must perform, who owns that work, and the commercial consequences if the product does not meet the allocated requirements.

How should an EPC price certification and interoperability work?

Separate document review, profile-gap analysis, integration-environment work, boundary testing, correction cycles and retesting. Assign each activity and cost to a named party before the bid basis is frozen.

From claim to acceptance evidence

Need to turn an O-PAS requirement into an executable specification?

CSI helps owners and EPCs map profiles to products, define supplier evidence, assign integration responsibility and write the interoperability and acceptance plan.

Review Your O-PAS Requirements → Open the EPC Resource Hub