Home › Open Process Automation for Owner-Operators

Strategy · Business Case · Procurement · Acceptance · Lifecycle

Open Process Automation for owner-operators Build owner control across the automation lifecycle

A practical roadmap for owner-operators evaluating and deploying Open Process Automation using the O-PAS™ Standard—from economic justification and first deployment through procurement, acceptance, operations, technology refresh and retirement.

The owner decision

The value of Open Process Automation is not created by buying different controllers. It comes from changing the lifecycle economics and control boundaries of the automation system.

Owner-operators need an explicit path for business case, architecture, application ownership, supplier competition, integration, acceptance, support, recovery, replacement and retirement. The objective is a system the owner can evolve without reconstructing the original project every time technology or suppliers change.

01 · Owner-operator roadmap

Use the authority library by decision stage

This page is the owner-side map through CSI's detailed OPA/O-PAS guidance. Each specialist guide owns the underlying technical or commercial decision.

02 · Business case

Evaluate lifecycle economics, not just initial system price

The owner decision should compare the cost and risk of the current automation lifecycle with a staged move toward more portable applications, replaceable components and competitive sourcing.

Refresh

Obsolescence exposure

Model forced refresh timing, unavailable components, engineering rework and production risk under the current architecture.

Applications

Preserved engineering value

Quantify the value of retaining owner-controlled IEC 61131 source, libraries, control intent and deployment assets across technology changes.

Competition

Lifecycle sourcing

Evaluate where defined interfaces and replacement boundaries can create supplier choice without destabilizing the complete system.

Build the economic case before choosing the pilot

The first deployment should test the assumptions that matter to the investment decision—not simply demonstrate that products can communicate.

Use the Open Process Automation Business Case Guide →

03 · Where to start

Choose a first deployment that creates reusable evidence

A strong first project solves a real funded need while representing architecture, supplier, application and lifecycle decisions that matter to the broader program.

Need

Real operating value

Anchor the project to an actual modernization, capacity, reliability, cybersecurity or obsolescence need.

Learning

Representative boundaries

Include the supplier combinations, IEC 61131 applications, interfaces and operating workflows the program needs to understand.

Reuse

Program assets

Produce architecture, requirements, interfaces, test methods, source, support procedures and evidence that the next deployment can reuse.

Use the O-PAS Pilot Project Planning Guide to define the charter, success criteria and scale-up evidence.

04 · Procurement and supplier selection

Procure the lifecycle behavior you expect to own

Owner requirements should define architecture roles, product evidence, interfaces, application assets, integration responsibility, acceptance, support and future replacement before suppliers price the work.

Owner procurement rule: product conformance supports product selection, but the owner still needs project-specific architecture, interoperability, acceptance and lifecycle requirements.

05 · Acceptance

Accept the integrated project, not a stack of supplier certificates

Product

Conformance evidence

Confirm exact product/version evidence and limitations.

System

Interoperability evidence

Demonstrate selected products, applications and services working together under the project configuration and credible failure conditions.

Project

Acceptance evidence

Close contractual functional, site, cybersecurity, recovery, resilience and lifecycle requirements.

Use the Requirements Traceability and Verification Matrix and FAT & Interoperability Testing Guide to control the evidence chain.

06 · Owner handover

Take custody of the assets required to operate and change the system

Project closeout should leave the owner with the accepted architecture, exact inventory, interfaces, IEC 61131 source, configuration, test evidence, recovery assets, credentials, licenses, support records and lifecycle responsibilities.

Handover is an operating capability test

The owner should be able to rebuild, restore, support and change the accepted system using transferred assets without depending on undocumented project knowledge.

Use the As-Built and Lifecycle Handover Guide →

08 · Technology refresh

Use replacement events to test whether the architecture is truly owner-controlled

The lifecycle objective is not change for its own sake. It is the ability to replace obsolete or unsuitable technology through a controlled qualification process without reopening unrelated parts of the architecture.

09 · Owner governance

Retain the decisions that should not be delegated

Architecture

Target state

Owner authority over architecture principles, required boundaries and acceptable dependencies.

Risk

Acceptance

Owner authority over deviations, residual risk, operating restrictions and lifecycle exceptions.

Baseline

Lifecycle custody

Owner control of source, configuration, credentials, evidence, support records and change history.

10 · Reference basis

Use the O-PAS Standard and current certification records as the authority basis

The Open Process Automation Forum describes the O-PAS Standard as an open, interoperable and secure architecture for industrial process automation systems. Owner requirements, project architecture and acceptance criteria should therefore be tied to the applicable Standard edition and supported by current certification evidence where product conformance is claimed.

The current published basis used for this guide is the O-PAS Standard, 2nd Edition. Product certification should be verified against The Open Group O-PAS Certification Register, while project interoperability, application behavior, cybersecurity, resilience, recovery and lifecycle manageability remain project-level responsibilities.

11 · Owner questions

Open Process Automation questions for owner-operators

These are the decisions an owner should resolve before treating OPA as a procurement exercise.

Why should an owner-operator consider Open Process Automation?

Open Process Automation gives an owner a standards-based path for changing lifecycle control boundaries: how applications are preserved, how components are replaced, how suppliers compete, and how the integrated system is supported over time. The business case should be based on the facility's lifecycle economics and operating requirements rather than assuming that an open architecture automatically produces savings.

When should an owner-operator start evaluating OPA?

The strongest decision point is usually before a major automation lifecycle event such as DCS modernization, obsolescence remediation, a new unit, significant expansion or another funded control-system change. Starting before architecture and procurement decisions are fixed allows the owner to compare lifecycle alternatives rather than trying to introduce openness after the system has already been selected.

Should an owner start with a pilot or a full OPA deployment?

A first deployment should be large enough to test the architecture, supplier boundaries, IEC 61131 applications, integration model, verification methods and lifecycle workflows that matter to the broader program, but contained enough to isolate risk and produce reusable evidence. The appropriate scope depends on the owner's modernization need and the uncertainties the investment decision must resolve.

What should an owner specify before selecting O-PAS products?

Define the target architecture, applicable requirements, supplier and integration responsibilities, interface boundaries, application ownership, cybersecurity requirements, verification basis, handover assets, support model and intended replacement boundaries. Product selection should follow those requirements rather than define them.

Does buying O-PAS-certified products create an open system?

No. Product certification provides evidence for the exact product, version and evaluated certification scope. The owner still has to define the system architecture and demonstrate interoperability, application behavior, cybersecurity, resilience, recovery, acceptance and lifecycle manageability for the assembled project.

What should an owner retain control of in an OPA project?

The owner should retain authority over the target architecture, required interfaces and replacement boundaries, application and lifecycle objectives, acceptance of deviations and residual risk, and custody of the accepted source, configuration, credentials, evidence, recovery assets and change history needed to operate and evolve the system.

What should an owner receive at OPA project handover?

The handover baseline should include the accepted as-built architecture, exact product and version inventory, IEC 61131 application source and dependencies, configuration and deployment assets, interface records, requirements and verification evidence, backup and recovery assets, credentials and licences, known defects, support responsibilities and lifecycle procedures.

How should an owner measure whether an OPA architecture remains open over time?

Test the operating consequences of change. The owner should be able to maintain applications, recover the system, change suppliers, replace obsolete components and qualify new technology through controlled interfaces and regression evidence without unnecessarily redesigning unrelated parts of the architecture.

12 · Where CSI fits

Use an integration partner to preserve owner objectives across supplier boundaries

CSI supports owner-operators from strategy and pilot definition through requirements, procurement, architecture, multi-vendor integration, acceptance and lifecycle transition.

Strategy

Define the program

Business case, target architecture, migration strategy, pilot selection and owner requirements.

Delivery

Integrate the system

Architecture, interfaces, IEC 61131 applications, suppliers, integration, FAT and commissioning.

Lifecycle

Sustain owner control

Handover, support model, change control, recovery, replacement and technology refresh.

See CSI's Open Process Automation System Integration capabilities →

From modernization decision to lifecycle ownership

Build an OPA program the owner can sustain

CSI can help define the economic case, owner requirements, procurement strategy, integration model, acceptance evidence and lifecycle controls for Open Process Automation.

O-PAS™ and Open Process Automation™ are trademarks of The Open Group. CSI is an independent commercial licensee of the O-PAS Standard. This guide is an owner-operator strategy and lifecycle planning aid and does not imply endorsement by The Open Group. The applicable owner requirements, contracts, current O-PAS Standard and current certification records govern each project.